Subjective value is the perceived value of your product or service in the mind of the prospect. According to one of the founding fathers of the Austrian School of Economics, Ludwig von Mises, “Value is not intrinsic, it is not in things. It is within us; it is the way in which man reacts to the conditions of his environment.”
Subjective valuation is the cornerstone of all economic activity. Money, often misconstrued as a measure of value, actually holds a subjective value that enables the acquisition of other goods and services. This intrinsic subjectivity is evident in every economic decision, where choices reflect personal preferences over a range of alternatives.
Consider the dynamics of any transaction—exchanges arise only when differing subjective valuations exist between parties. At the point of exchange, both buyer and seller perceive themselves as better off, highlighting the subjective underpinnings of economic interactions. The decision-making process involves evaluating benefits and costs, both of which are inherently subjective. We choose based on the belief that the benefits of our decision will exceed those of the next best alternative.
Interestingly, an entire industry has been created out of the concept of subjective value: that of insight sales. The idea that product or service insights—and thereby subjective value—could be created in the minds of prospects or customers has resulted in enormous ventures such as HubSpot, Marketo and other marketing automation solutions.
In a world of extensive specialization and division of labor, most goods are crafted for exchange rather than direct consumption by producers. This underscores the principle that subjective valuations are not only crucial for individual decisions but also for broader market dynamics. As producers and consumers engage in exchanges, they do so with differing valuations, which is what makes trade beneficial for both parties.
Ultimately, economic activity is not about maximizing monetary gain but about achieving the greatest subjective satisfaction. The outdated notion of the “economic man” seeking only to maximize monetary wealth overlooks the nuanced reality: individuals strive for maximum psychic or subjective profit, which guides their economic choices and interactions.
Elements of Subjective Value
Marketing automation solutions provide a consistent flow of information to prospects and customers. The entire intention of this is to create that subjective value. Of course, subjective value is also created in many other ways such as direct salesperson contact.
Subjective value exists in the mind of the prospect or customer—as opposed to “objective” value which can be plainly seen, such as with a gold nugget.
An extreme example of subjective value can be demonstrated by what is known as the “diamond-water paradox.” The value of a diamond versus the value of water would totally depend on the subjective preference of the receiver. If someone were carrying a diamond around in New York City and became thirsty, it is highly unlikely he or she would be willing to trade that diamond for a bottle of water, as water is quite plentiful there and easy to come by. Place that same individual in the Gobi Desert, however, hundreds of miles from the nearest water source, and a purveyor of water might well gain that diamond in exchange for water. The subjective value of water for the holder of that diamond is quite high in that circumstance.
This paradox underscores a fundamental principle in economics: subjective valuation is at the core of all economic activity. Money, often mistaken as a measure of value, is actually imbued with subjective value by individuals as a means to acquire goods and services. This subjective valuation is expressed through choices and actions, revealing preferences over alternative options.
Every economic decision involves an opportunity cost, the benefits of the next best alternative forgone. This cost is inherently subjective, as individuals weigh their value assessments against potential benefits. Thus, exchanges occur when there are differences in subjective valuations between parties, with each considering themselves better off post-trade.
The critique of the “economic man” myth—depicting market participants as solely money-driven—further highlights the importance of subjective profit. People seek satisfaction beyond monetary gain, balancing their monetary position with nonmonetary factors. While financial returns and low prices are desired in investment and consumption, nonmonetary satisfaction often takes precedence, especially in employment decisions.
Ultimately, while money revenues and costs are concrete references in economic activities, they do not capture the true essence of value from a subjective standpoint. Distinguishing between subjective valuation and objective price is crucial for understanding the complexities of economic behavior and market interactions.
Understanding Marginal Utility and the Paradox of Value
The principle of marginal utility addresses how individuals prioritize the use of additional quantities of a good or service. Simply put, each extra unit of a good fulfills a slightly less pressing need than the previous one. This hierarchy of need drives individuals to allocate resources according to the urgency and importance of their desires.
Breaking Down the Paradox of Value
Historically, the paradox of value puzzled economists: why do diamonds cost more than water, despite water being essential for survival and diamonds being primarily ornamental? The answer lies in the concept of scarcity and the principle of diminishing marginal utility.
- Scarcity and Abundance: The abundance of water means it can be used for a wide range of purposes, from drinking to gardening, thus rendering each additional unit less critical in our hierarchy of needs. In contrast, diamonds are rare, making each additional diamond significantly valuable.
- Marginal Utility: The value of a good, such as water, is determined by its use in its least critical application. The utility you derive from using an extra glass of water for a less important purpose, like washing your car, sets its value in this context.
- Resolution of the Paradox: This principle resolves the paradox by demonstrating that prices reflect the value of an extra unit in its least necessary application, rather than its overall importance. With water being abundant, its marginal utility is low, which explains its lower price compared to diamonds.
In essence, the principle of marginal utility clarifies why we don’t choose between all diamonds and all water, but rather between specific uses of each. This nuanced understanding of how individual needs influence the value of goods removes the so-called “paradox of value.” Through this lens, prices are seen to arise from specific quantities rather than broad categories of goods.
Bringing the concept closer to home: If your company sells database software, for example, that makes it incredibly easy for data to be ported from a legacy system into your system, that factor might mean everything to a prospect that has experienced nothing but grief in trying to port legacy data. That database feature is highly valued in his or her mind—or in the minds of decision-makers at their company. For a company that doesn’t have a legacy system and would be starting anew with your product, other database functionality would have a higher priority, so the porting feature’s subjective value would mean less to them.
Today, data has highly subjective value, depending on context. With the web and with data mining, an infinite amount of data is available to everyone for low to no cost. For most people and companies, though, most of that data is worthless as it’s not correct for that company.
I have a company called uptime that programs for World Check risk intelligence software, utilized by banks throughout the world. The data provided by World Check directly relates to money laundering, fraud and terrorism. It is incredibly valuable to banks. Without this software banks take incredible risks, as anyone listed with World Check cannot legally open a bank account. Hence it has a very high subjective value.
Understanding Subjective Valuation in a Market Economy
In a market-driven economy, subjective valuation plays a pivotal role in determining the use and exchange value of goods and services. Let’s examine how subjective perceptions shape these values.
Specialization and Exchange
In modern economies, production primarily aims to create goods and services for others’ consumption, not just for the producers themselves. This shift towards specialized production is a hallmark of advanced societies. Here, the value of goods goes beyond their immediate use, gaining significance through their potential exchange value.
Dual Nature of Goods
Every item in a market holds two types of value:
- Use Value: This reflects the direct satisfaction or utility a consumer derives from using the product.
- Exchange Value: This is the worth assigned to a product based on the other goods or money it can be traded for.
The Role of Subjective Valuation
Subjective valuation is the engine driving these values. Individuals determine the worth of a good based on personal preferences and the potential benefits it brings. This subjective perspective dictates the highest satisfaction a person expects from exchanging a good.
- For Consumers: If a product’s use value is greater, they choose to utilize it directly to maximize personal satisfaction.
- For Producers and Traders: The emphasis shifts to exchange value. They assess how much others value the product in trade, aiming to get the most desirable return, whether it’s goods or money.
Decision-Making Dynamics
Decision-makers balance these two values:
- Greater Use Value: Leads to consuming or holding the product for personal use.
- Greater Exchange Value: Encourages trading the product to gain something more valuable in return.
Conclusion
Ultimately, subjective valuation influences which value—use or exchange takes precedence. This choice underpins supply and demand dynamics, nudging the market towards equilibrium. Understanding this interplay aids in grasping how personal preferences and expectations shape market outcomes.
Nonmonetary factors can significantly impact economic decision-making, even when financial gain isn’t maximized. Here’s how:
Employment Decisions
When it comes to job choices, individuals might prioritize factors beyond salary. For example:
- Work-life balance: Someone may opt for a job with flexible hours over a higher-paying but demanding role.
- Company culture: A friendly and supportive workplace might be more appealing than a high-pressure environment, even if the latter offers a bigger paycheck.
- Location: A job closer to home or in a preferred city can outweigh bigger financial incentives elsewhere.
Investment Choices
Investors often aim for high financial returns, but other elements can steer their decisions:
- Ethical considerations: Some might choose companies that align with their personal values, such as environmentally-friendly operations, even if returns are slightly lower.
- Reputation and trust: Brands like Tesla or Apple might attract investors due to their strong market standing and innovative track record.
Consumer Spending
When purchasing goods, consumers generally hunt for the best deals, yet other influences come into play:
- Brand loyalty: A shopper might spend more on a trusted brand like Nike or Dyson for perceived quality and reliability.
- Product sustainability: Increasingly, people are choosing eco-friendly products, prioritizing environmental impact over cost.
In summary, economic decisions are not just about the numbers. Real-life choices frequently hinge on a mix of financial and nonmonetary elements, each varying in importance depending on the situation.
Understanding the Diminishing Marginal Utility of Money
Diminishing marginal utility is pivotal in understanding how we value money. Simply put, the principle states that the added satisfaction or utility you gain from each additional unit decreases as you acquire more of something. This applies to goods like apples or grains and equally to money.
Prioritizing Needs and Goals
When individuals receive money, they allocate it to satisfy their needs in order of urgency. Imagine you’ve just received a bonus; you’ll probably spend it first on urgent needs like paying bills or buying groceries before considering luxury items. This reflects the declining utility of each dollar as all essential expenses are met.
Incremental Allocation of Money
One of money’s unique features is its divisibility, allowing for precise allocation across various needs. Unlike larger items, money can be broken down into smaller units to incrementally meet different goals. For instance, you can adjust your spending between groceries, savings, and entertainment with exact amounts.
Marginal Utility in Practice
The concept can be likened to a scenario where you have multiple units of a resource, and each serves a different purpose. Initially, money meets the highest priority requirement, like rent or debt reduction. Any extra money serves progressively less critical needs. Thus, the marginal utility of the last dollar is tied to the least significant objective it’s used for. If you were to lose a dollar, it’s this least important function that would be sacrificed.
Allocating Money Based on Preferences
Personal preferences heavily influence how money is distributed. People balance their funds among immediate consumption, investment in future income, and savings. Your individual scale of values will guide these decisions. For example, someone might prioritize savings for a future goal over extravagant dining.
In essence, while each dollar initially provides substantial utility, as your financial situation improves, each additional dollar contributes less directly to your total satisfaction. Understanding this principle helps in making more strategic financial decisions, ensuring that your money brings maximum satisfaction and aligns with your priorities.
The Role of Money in Modern Economies
In modern economies, money acts as a linchpin in facilitating the complex web of trade and commerce. Its primary role is to enable the exchange of goods and services beyond the immediate reach of barter systems. By acting as a universal medium, money simplifies transactions that the limitations of direct trading would otherwise hinder.
Use Value Vs. Exchange Value
To understand money’s influence, it’s crucial to explore two types of value associated with goods and services: use value and exchange value.
- Use Value: This is the intrinsic benefit a consumer derives directly from using a product or service. It provides satisfaction or utility based on personal needs and preferences.
- Exchange Value: This refers to the worth that a good or service holds in a market environment, primarily indicating what others are willing to give in exchange for it.
Money strongly aligns with exchange value. It offers a straightforward method for evaluating and trading goods and services based on their perceived market worth rather than their immediate usefulness to an individual producer.
Money as a Medium and Measure
Money serves as a medium of exchange and a measure of value, assigning a standardized worth to various commodities, facilitating the exchange process, and allowing for the storage and accumulation of wealth. In an economy dominated by specialization and division of labor, individuals and businesses focus on producing specific goods or services, then exchange them using money to fulfill their diversified needs and wants.
Determining the Greater Value
The decision to use or exchange a good depends on which value holds more significance at any given moment. When the use value surpasses the exchange value, individuals tend to consume or utilize the good directly. Conversely, when the exchange value is greater, the good is likely to be traded for other desirable commodities or saved for potential future exchanges.
Conclusion
Money bridges the gap between use and exchange value, empowering consumers and producers to navigate a market-driven economy efficiently. It transforms subjective value into a tangible form that can be universally accepted, enhancing the fluidity and scalability of economic activities. This pivotal role underscores money’s integral place in shaping modern economic landscapes.
Critique of the “Economic Man” Concept in Classical Economics
The classical concept of the “economic man” portrays individuals in the market as always striving to maximize their wealth. This view, however, has been challenged for failing to account for the subjective nature of human decision-making. Unlike the narrow focus on monetary gains, people often seek what can be described as “subjective profit,” which includes various non-monetary factors that influence their choices.
Many individuals choose to forego additional wealth when they perceive the associated costs to outweigh the benefits. For example, investors may decline lucrative opportunities in industries they ethically oppose. Similarly, consumers evaluate more than just the price or product quality when making purchases—they consider aspects like convenience, employee friendliness, and the overall shopping experience.
Another example is wealthy business owners who continue working not solely for financial gain, but because they find personal satisfaction or purpose in their work. Moreover, when selecting a career or job, individuals often weigh factors beyond salary, such as work-life balance and job satisfaction.
The essence of these observations is that people do not operate as “economic men” driven purely by money. Even in financial matters, exhaustive monetary calculations are impractical and unnecessary for every decision. Instead, people follow a principle of making detailed evaluations only when the stakes justify the effort. They rely on broader judgments for everyday choices, emphasizing practicality over precision.
How is the Value of a Unit of a Good Determined According to the Principle of Diminishing Marginal Utility?
The principle of diminishing marginal utility explains how the value of a unit of a good is assessed based on its least crucial use. It is about understanding what you would lose if you had one less unit of that good. To explore this concept, imagine a pioneer farmer harvesting five sacks of grain.
- Basic Necessities: The first sack ensures his survival until the next harvest.
- Enhanced Living: The second sack enhances his health and strength.
- Diet Variety: The third sack adds diversity to his diet by allowing him to raise poultry.
- Leisure Use: The fourth is used for making brandy.
- Non-Essential Enjoyment: The final sack is purely for leisure, feeding parrots that bring him joy.
The principle suggests that the value is tied to the least important use—feeding the parrots, in this case. If he loses a sack, he sacrifices feeding the parrots, not his basic needs or health. Therefore, the unit’s value equals the utility of its least essential purpose.
In practical terms, when considering multiple identical units of a commodity, the value of each unit is determined by the satisfaction (utility) derived from its final, least necessary use. The idea is: if one unit is lost, what you ultimately give up dictates the value of that unit. As more units become available, each additional unit serves a progressively less significant need, illustrating diminishing returns in utility.
Thus, the principle of diminishing marginal utility emphasizes that a good’s subjective value is linked to the prioritization of its uses, calculated from the bottom up.
Use of Subjective Value in Commerce
Today many (or maybe even most) products and services are fiercely competitive, and it is only subjective value in marketing that makes it possible for one to overtake the other. A prime example is automobile marketing. The SUV, from product to product, has nearly identical available features. In order for manufacturers to “position” their product above others in the prospect’s mind is to add subjective value. They add extra services, such as their own roadside repair. One manufacturer even adds their own concierge for booking of hotels, travel, or entertainment events.
This isn’t as true in my own industry, CRM, as they’re not as easy to compare. But because we design Pipeliner with these principles in mind, we have made excellent use of subjective value in Pipeliner.
Understanding the Relationship Between Subjective Valuation and Monetary Calculations in Economic Decision-Making
Economic activities are grounded in the principle of subjective valuation. This means that individuals assign their value to goods and services, which is not directly measurable by money. Instead, money is a medium that helps facilitate the acquisition of desired items. Every decision or act individuals take reflects the values they attach to their choices.
Although money appears to be a universal metric of worth, it actually represents the subjective preferences of those using it. When a decision is made, it signifies a choice that stands out as preferable over all other possible alternatives. Importantly, each choice carries an inherent cost, represented by the opportunity to pursue the next best alternative.
A Clash Between Subjective and Monetary Calculations
The concept of equal exchange in economic dealings is a misconception. Both buyers and sellers participate in transactions because they perceive that personal gains outweigh losses. Sellers, for instance, often value the money they receive more than the goods they sell, while buyers feel that the worth of what they receive surpasses the money spent.
Producers typically create goods for exchange rather than personal use in the extensive web of modern economies with specialization and division of labor. Their primary interest lies in the financial return from selling these goods, reflecting their valuation attached to potential profits.
Despite money’s critical role, individuals do not act strictly for monetary gain. Decisions are influenced by an individual’s subjective evaluation of satisfaction or utility, including non-monetary factors like ethical standing or personal beliefs. Moreover, customer service and store ambiance can significantly impact consumer choices beyond product prices.
Economic Decisions Beyond Monetary Gain
The idea that people constantly seek to maximize monetary wealth, often called the “economic man” theory, falls short of reality. People pursue subjective benefits that may not always align with financial gain. For instance, some investors avoid specific industries due to ethical concerns, even if they promise substantial returns.
While monetary calculations are vital, they complement rather than define the full spectrum of decision-making. People strive to enhance their financial situation when nonmonetary factors are neutral; however, in many scenarios, these nonmonetary elements outweigh financial considerations, particularly in career or lifestyle choices.
Balancing Money with Subjective Values
There is no denying that in a market-driven economy, where money acts as a medium of exchange, people aim to maximize their purchasing power to access a wider array of goods and services. However, it’s equally important to acknowledge that individuals may willingly accept less financial gain if nonmonetary factors justify the trade-off.
The balances between subjective values, such as personal satisfaction, and the objective measure of money influence economic decision-making. While monetary revenues and costs are critical to sustaining economic activities, they do not encapsulate individuals’ personal valuation on their choices.
In conclusion, subjective valuations are core to economic decision-making, coloring how monetary calculations are performed. Although money calculations are essential for maintaining economic operations, they are merely tools for achieving greater personal satisfaction—an inherently subjective pursuit.
Subjective Value and Pipeliner CRM
A salesperson uses subjective value very effectively within Pipeliner. A salesperson’s subjective value of a prospect or customer is expressed within Pipeliner’s graphical Buying Center and Org Chart. With these tools a sales team can accurately express both the subjective and objective value of each person within a prospect or customer organization. They are graphically shown as to how they relate to each other, both in hierarchy and as to how they influence a sale. Each person is labeled as a naysayer, a budget holder, a decision maker, and influencer, and so on.
Pipeliner is actually the only CRM in the world that contains, right out of the box, the correlation between the Org Chart, the account, the contacts and the Buying Center within the opportunity. Why do we believe this is important? Because the more complex the offering, the more high-end the product or service, the more important are relationships. In higher-end opportunities, it’s never one person who makes the buying decision–it’s a team. And there’s nothing more subjective than a team.
Subjective value is yet another economic principle that has high applicability to sales forces throughout the world. Fully understand it and increase the number of deals your company pulls through the door.
Pipeliner CRM empowers salespeople to fully communicate subjective value. Get your free trial of Pipeliner CRM now.
Comments